Mia's Feed
Medical News & Research

Study Links Sex-Selective Abortion Bans to Negative Birth Outcomes in Asian Immigrant Women

Study Links Sex-Selective Abortion Bans to Negative Birth Outcomes in Asian Immigrant Women

Share this article

A Yale study reveals that sex-selective abortion bans in certain U.S. states negatively impact maternal and infant health among Asian immigrant women, without affecting birth sex ratios, highlighting the need for nuanced policy approaches.

2 min read

Recent research conducted by Yale sociologist Emma Zang indicates that laws banning sex-selective abortions (SSABs)—which prohibit seeking abortions based on the fetus's sex—may have unintended harmful effects on maternal and infant health, particularly among Asian immigrant populations in the United States. These bans, currently enacted in 14 states, have been shown to increase the incidence of low birth weight and preterm births among infants born to Asian immigrant mothers. The study found that in states with SSABs, the likelihood of newborns weighing less than 5 pounds 8 ounces rose by 0.3 percentage points, and preterm births before 37 weeks increased by 0.5 percentage points. This equates to over 2,900 additional at-risk infants among Asian immigrant mothers in just six states examined.

Interestingly, the research also revealed that these bans do not influence the sex ratios at birth, undermining rationale arguments that such laws target or reduce sex-selective practices. Critics argue that proponents often deploy xenophobic stereotypes about Asian cultures prioritizing male children, which these laws inadvertently reinforce.

The findings further suggest that these restrictive policies create a hostile social environment, contributing to stress responses such as fluctuations in blood pressure and inflammation among pregnant women, which can adversely affect fetal development. The study emphasizes that such laws may stigmatize Asian immigrant communities rather than address the actual prevalence of sex-selective cessation behaviors, which do not appear to be widespread in the U.S.

Published in the journal Social Science & Medicine, this second-of-its-kind study analyzed birth data from over 12 million cases spanning from 2005 to 2019. The research highlights the importance of nuanced policy discussions around abortion, immigration, and social stigmatization, urging lawmakers to understand the broader health implications of such restrictive laws.

Source: [https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-08-sex-abortion-maternal-infant-health.html]

Stay Updated with Mia's Feed

Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.

How often would you like updates?

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Related Articles

Experts Warn that Many Over-the-Counter Health Tests Are Inadequate and Require Stricter Regulation

Studies reveal many over-the-counter health self-tests in the UK are unsafe and unreliable, calling for stricter regulation to protect consumers and healthcare systems.

New Research Reveals Deep Brain Regions Integrate Sensory Input to Trigger Consciousness

A groundbreaking Yale study reveals that deep brain regions like the midbrain and thalamus are activated by all sensory inputs during focused attention, linking them to consciousness and offering new insights into neurological disorders.

How APOL1 Mutations Impact Mitochondrial Function in Kidney Disease Revealed by Organoid Models

New research using kidney organoids uncovers how APOL1 gene mutations impair mitochondrial function, shedding light on mechanisms behind genetic kidney disease and opening doors for targeted therapies.

Uncertainty Surrounds Use of Antidepressants During Pregnancy

Debate continues over the safety and benefits of prescribing antidepressants during pregnancy, highlighting the need for more research and personalized care to support maternal mental health and fetal safety.