Questions Arise Over Citations in 'Make America Healthy Again' Report
A White House health report faces scrutiny after it was revealed that several cited studies are nonexistent, raising concerns about its credibility and scientific accuracy.
A recent White House report titled 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA), released on May 22, 2025, has come under scrutiny after reports revealed that several cited studies do not exist. The report, which was commissioned to evaluate factors contributing to childhood chronic diseases, included references to academic papers and authors who, upon investigation, stated they never authored the cited work. Notably, Noah Kreski from Columbia University clarified that a citation linked to a study on adolescent anxiety during COVID-19 was not one of their publications. The link directing users to a peer-reviewed article in JAMA was broken, and Jim Michalski from JAMA Network Media Relations confirmed that the article was not published in any JAMA journal.
Further inquiries uncovered that Harold Farber, a pediatrics professor at Baylor College of Medicine, and Brian McNeill from Virginia Commonwealth University, who are credited as co-authors, reported that they had no involvement with the papers attributed to them. Additionally, a purported 2008 publication on ADHD medication listed in the report was not found by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which explicitly stated that they could not locate the title in their archives.
These findings cast doubt on the scholarly integrity of the MAHA report, raising concerns about its credibility. The Department of Health and Human Services deferred comment, pointing questions towards the White House. The report also includes controversial views such as linking chronic diseases to discredited theories about vaccines and criticizing the increasing prescription of psychiatric drugs and antibiotics for children. Critics argue that the report seems to echo unfounded theories long debunked by scientific research, highlighting issues of misinformation and the need for accurate referencing in health policy documents.
The controversy surrounding this report underscores the importance of verifying sources in influential health policy reports and may impact public trust in government health initiatives. Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-05-america-healthy-cites-nonexistent-authors.html
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Legal Protections Reinforce Free Speech Rights at Universities Like Harvard
A federal court affirms that government cannot retaliate against universities like Harvard by withdrawing research funding for expressing dissenting views, reinforcing First Amendment protections for free speech and academic autonomy.
Innovative Use of CAR T-Cell Therapy Restores Movement in Patients with Rare Autoimmune Neuropathy
Researchers have successfully employed CAR T-cell therapy to treat two patients with severe autoimmune neuropathy, leading to significant motor improvement and demonstrating a promising new approach for autoimmune nervous system diseases.
Breakthrough in Childhood Leukemia Treatment: New Drug Combination Shows Promise
A groundbreaking drug combination developed by Cambridge scientists shows promise in treating childhood leukemia more effectively and with fewer side effects, potentially transforming future therapies.
Innovative Dental Flosser with Built-In Stress Monitoring Sensor
A groundbreaking dental floss pick now features a built-in sensor capable of monitoring cortisol levels, offering a convenient and non-invasive method for at-home stress detection.