High-markup Hospitals Have Worse Patient Outcomes Despite Higher Charges
A new UCLA study reveals that hospitals with higher charges often have poorer patient outcomes, highlighting the need for transparency and regulation in healthcare pricing.
Recent research from UCLA has shed light on the troubling correlation between hospital pricing strategies and patient health results. The study highlights that hospitals charging significantly higher prices for services—particularly for-profit and investor-owned institutions located in major metropolitan areas—tend to have considerably poorer patient outcomes compared to lower-cost hospitals. These high-markup hospitals, which mark up charges up to 17 times their actual costs, make up about 10% of hospitals examined in the study.
The research, published in JAMA Surgery, analyzed data from nearly 2,000 U.S. hospitals performing major elective surgeries such as abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, and hip replacement. Out of these, 196 hospitals were classified as high-markup, serving approximately 42,600 patients.
Patients treated at these high-markup facilities faced increased risks: they had a 45% higher chance of developing complications like cardiac, respiratory, infectious, or kidney issues, and a 33% greater likelihood of readmission within 30 days for non-elective reasons. Contrary to expectations, paying more did not translate into better care or outcomes—in fact, the data indicates worse results at these costly centers.
Dr. Sara Sakowitz, the lead researcher, emphasized that hospital prices impact everyone—patients, families, taxpayers, and health systems—especially when excessively high charges generate financial strain, including higher insurance premiums, deductibles, and potential medical bankruptcy. Transparency in pricing and outcomes is lacking, making it difficult for patients to make informed choices or for policymakers to regulate effectively.
The study underscores the need for increased price transparency, standardized reporting of hospital markups, and regulations—currently only in place in Maryland and West Virginia. Improving transparency would help patients understand costs upfront and enable comparisons of hospital quality and price. Ultimately, building a fairer, safer, and more accountable healthcare system requires addressing these disparities and ensuring that higher prices correlate with better outcomes.
source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-09-high-markup-hospitals-significantly-worse.html
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Relying on Billing Codes in Medical Research May Lead to Significant Misdiagnoses
UCLA-led research warns that reliance on billing codes for disease identification may result in misdiagnosis in up to 66% of cases, highlighting issues in medical data accuracy.
Understanding Why Preventive Mastectomy Isn't Accessible to All at-Risk Individuals
Preventive mastectomy can save lives but remains unevenly accessible, with disparities based on genetic risk factors. Learn why medical equity in breast cancer prevention is essential.
Safety and Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity Treatment in Adults with Mental Illness
New evidence shows GLP-1 receptor agonists are safe and effective in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic health in adults with mental illness, with no increased risk of adverse psychiatric effects. These medications offer promising benefits for addressing obesity in this vulnerable population.
Congressional Plans to Address Rising Obamacare Premiums Focus on Reduced Coverage Options
Amid rising premiums, the Trump administration proposes expanding access to less comprehensive 'catastrophic' health plans, aiming to provide more affordable options for Americans facing increased costs under Obamacare in 2025.