Mia's Feed
Medical News & Research

New Insights into Healthcare Costs for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

New Insights into Healthcare Costs for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Share this article

A recent study reveals that families with children undergoing autism treatment face nearly ten times higher healthcare costs, highlighting the significant financial burden associated with ASD management.

2 min read

Recent research sheds light on the significant healthcare expenses faced by families with children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The study, based on a nationally representative survey from 2018 to 2022, reveals that families with a child undergoing treatment for ASD incur nearly ten times higher healthcare costs compared to those without ASD treatment. Specifically, families with treated ASD reported average total expenditures of $20,122, in contrast to $2,201 for children without ASD treatment. Notably, up to 70% of these costs for children with treated ASD were directly related to ASD-specific care, although this proportion tended to decrease with age.

Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental condition that impacts brain development, influencing social interactions, communication, behaviors, and interests. Symptoms often become evident before age three, including difficulties with social engagement and repetitive behaviors.

The survey also highlighted gender disparities, with treated ASD being three times more common among boys than girls. Additionally, the financial burden varies based on insurance type and socioeconomic status; children with public insurance and families living below the poverty line tend to have lower healthcare spending than those with private insurance and higher-income families.

In terms of healthcare utilization, outpatient visits constituted the largest portion of expenditures at 51% ($10,279), followed by home health care at 36% ($7,168). These costs were substantially higher than those for children without ASD, where outpatient expenses averaged $1,101 and home health care costs averaged $102. The analysis underscores the considerable financial impact of ASD treatment on families, particularly in specific areas of care.

It's important to note that expenses related to behavioral treatments provided in school settings and institutions were not included in this analysis. Additionally, about one-third of children with a diagnosis of ASD are not currently receiving treatment. Various federal and local agencies offer support to families, including early intervention services.

For more on autism spectrum disorder, visit the CDC's site at https://www.cdc.gov/autism/index.html.

Stay Updated with Mia's Feed

Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.

How often would you like updates?

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Related Articles

H. pylori Screening Unlikely to Lower Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk After Heart Attack, Study Shows

A groundbreaking study shows that routine screening for H. pylori infection does not significantly reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients after a heart attack, questioning the effectiveness of widespread screening in this context.

Higher Overdose Death Rates Among Men Linked to Alcohol and Drug Co-Use

Men are two to three times more likely to die from overdose, partly due to the common practice of combining alcohol with drugs like fentanyl. New research highlights the risks and calls for targeted prevention efforts.

The Spread of Red Meat Allergy Triggered by Tick Bites and the Role of Different Ticks in Alpha-Gal Syndrome

Alpha-gal syndrome is an increasingly common allergy triggered by tick bites, causing severe reactions to red meat and other mammalian products. This global spread involves multiple tick species, not just the lone star tick. Awareness and prevention are key to managing this emerging health concern.

US Medical Panel Affirms Support for Vaccines Amid Political Controversy

A U.S. advisory committee, influenced by vaccine skeptics, is debating changes to vaccination schedules amid concerns from health experts about potential public health risks. Despite political influence, the panel affirms its pro-vaccine stance, emphasizing the importance of scientific evidence in immunization policies.