New Guidelines for Clinical Homologous Recombination Deficiency Testing Published

The Association for Molecular Pathology has published new best practice guidelines for homologous recombination deficiency testing, aiming to standardize assays and enhance cancer diagnosis and treatment outcomes.
The Association for Molecular Pathology has released comprehensive new guidelines for the development and implementation of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing in clinical laboratories. These best practice recommendations aim to standardize procedures and improve the accuracy of HRD detection, which is crucial for personalized cancer therapy. The manuscript, titled "Recommendations for Clinical Molecular Laboratories for Detection of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Cancer," was published in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.
HRD testing plays an essential role in identifying tumors with impaired DNA repair mechanisms. Such tumors are often characterized by genomic instability and may respond favorably to targeted treatments like PARP inhibitors. Currently, different assays are available for HRD detection, but they vary in their biomarkers, algorithms, and definitions, potentially influencing treatment decisions.
To address these discrepancies, a dedicated expert panel reviewed current methodologies and literature, involving organizations such as the Association of Community Cancer Centers, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the College of American Pathologists. Led by Dr. Alanna J. Church, the panel identified significant variability across testing practices, including sample requirements, tumor types, and molecular techniques. The new guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to enhance standardization, transparency, and quality in HRD testing.
Further, the American Molecular Pathology (AMP) HRD Working Group developed 12 specific recommendations concerning the design, validation, and interpretation of HRD assays. These are based on extensive survey data, literature review, and expert consensus, aiming to guide laboratories in technical aspects of HRD analysis and ensure clinical relevance.
Dr. Susan Hsiao, chair of the working group, emphasized that these guidelines are intended to direct clinical labs offering HRD testing and highlight the need for ongoing research and validation as scientific understanding advances. The ultimate goal is to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes through standardized, reliable HRD testing procedures.
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Why New Zealand’s Limited Access to the Cochrane Library Raises Concerns
New Zealand is reducing access to the Cochrane Library, a vital source of independent health evidence, raising concerns about health equity and informed decision-making. Learn about the implications of this policy change.
Innovative Digital Twin Technology Enhances Artificial Pancreas for Better Diabetes Management
A new digital twin technology integrated into artificial pancreas systems significantly improves blood sugar control for people with type 1 diabetes by enabling personalized, adaptive management.
Wyandotte County, Kansas, Launches Low-Cost Measles Vaccination Initiative to Prevent Outbreak
Wyandotte County in Kansas is increasing access to low-cost measles vaccines amid rising cases in neighboring regions to prevent an outbreak and protect public health.
Genetic Marker Discovery Could Enhance Brain Cancer Treatment Personalization
A groundbreaking study identifies a genetic biomarker that could help tailor glioblastoma treatment with bevacizumab, potentially improving outcomes through personalized medicine.



