Mia's Feed
Medical News & Research

FDA Panel Questions Kennedy's Skepticism on Antidepressants During Pregnancy

FDA Panel Questions Kennedy's Skepticism on Antidepressants During Pregnancy

Share this article

The FDA convened a panel to discuss antidepressant use during pregnancy amid skepticism from critics like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., highlighting ongoing debates about safety, efficacy, and mental health treatment for expectant mothers.

2 min read

On July 21, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened a panel to discuss the safety and efficacy of antidepressant use during pregnancy. The session, initiated partly in response to comments from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., featured a group of panelists known for their skeptical views on antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Despite the panel's two-hour discussion, many experts criticized the unproven theories presented, which linked maternal antidepressant use to adverse outcomes like autism and fetal alcohol syndrome.

Kennedy, a prominent critic of SSRIs, has publicly questioned their effectiveness and safety, alleging connections to school shootings and addiction—claims that lack scientific support. During the meeting, panelists echoed similar sentiments, suggesting that the overprescription of SSRIs in pregnant women might be problematic. Some proposed that these medications could impact fetal brain development, potentially leading to conditions such as autism or depression, although concrete evidence remains lacking.

The discussion drew attention to broader concerns about mental health treatment during pregnancy. Data indicate that depression and anxiety affect approximately 10-22% of pregnant women, with about 6% taking SSRIs during pregnancy. Medical experts generally emphasize the importance of managing mental health conditions, noting that untreated depression can result in negative outcomes for both mother and child.

FDA Director Marty Makary emphasized the need to address root causes of depression and warned against unnecessary overprescribing, stating that excessive medication may be associated with increased health issues like diabetes and depression. Several panelists, including YouTuber Josef Witt-Doerring, doctor David Healy, and psychiatrist Joanna Moncrieff, questioned the benefits of antim depressants, with some asserting they do not effectively treat depression.

The meeting also touched on political and social narratives, with Kennedy's comments drawing criticism from Congressional Democrats. They argued that spreading unverified claims could discourage women from seeking necessary treatment. Evidence-based guidelines from organizations like the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology continue to support the careful use of antidepressants during pregnancy, weighing the risks and benefits.

Experts from Johns Hopkins and other institutions highlighted the risks of untreated mental illness, including poor prenatal care and risky behaviors. Some researchers pointed out minimal links between specific drugs like paroxetine and congenital defects, underscoring the importance of shared decision-making that considers both maternal and fetal health. Overall, the panel underscored that treating mental health issues during pregnancy remains a critical aspect of maternal and fetal well-being.

Stay Updated with Mia's Feed

Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.

How often would you like updates?

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Related Articles

The Immediate and Long-Term Health Benefits of Quitting Alcohol: A Timeline of Recovery

Discover the timeline of health improvements after quitting alcohol, from immediate benefits like better sleep and hydration to long-term reductions in chronic disease risks. Every alcohol-free day counts for your well-being.

FDA Approves Monthly Treatment Andembry for Hereditary Angioedema

The FDA has approved Andembry, a groundbreaking monthly injection for hereditary angioedema, offering effective prevention and improved quality of life for patients.

New Survey Highlights Discrepancies in How Patients with Obesity and Doctors View the Causes and Goals of Obesity

A global survey uncovers significant gaps between how people with obesity and healthcare providers perceive the causes of obesity and their treatment goals, emphasizing the need for more compassionate, evidence-based care.

Comparative Review Evaluates Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

A recent review in JAMA Dermatology compares the efficacy and safety of various treatments for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa, highlighting promising biologic options and the need for further research.