Implicit Bias and Its Effect on Prosocial Effort in Autistic and Non-Autistic Individuals

Societal stigma and implicit biases influence how much effort autistic and non-autistic individuals put into charitable actions, highlighting the importance of addressing unconscious attitudes to foster inclusivity.
Recent research indicates that societal stigma and implicit biases towards autistic people can influence the level of effort individuals are willing to invest in prosocial or charitable behaviors. A study conducted by the University of Birmingham involved 30 autistic and 30 non-autistic adults who were asked to squeeze a hand grip to earn rewards either for themselves, for others sharing their neurotype, or for those with a different neurotype.
Findings revealed that all participants prioritized earning rewards for themselves over others, and efforts to help others were generally lower regardless of whether the recipient was autistic or non-autistic. Interestingly, while non-autistic individuals exerted similar effort for both autistic and non-autistic peers, autistic participants showed a tendency to invest more effort when helping fellow autistic individuals.
A significant aspect of the study was the assessment of implicit and explicit biases. Results showed that implicit biases against autistic people, measured through implicit association tests, were linked to a reduced willingness to exert effort for others. Explicit biases, on the other hand, did not predict effort levels.
For autistic individuals, stronger implicit biases correlated with lower motivation to help their autistic peers. In non-autistic participants, implicit biases did not affect effort directed at autistic individuals but were associated with increased effort for non-autistic peers.
Dr. Sophie Sowden-Carvalho emphasized the importance of these findings, suggesting that unconscious biases play a more substantial role in prosocial behavior than conscious attitudes. Addressing implicit biases and promoting acceptance can potentially improve support and cooperation between different neurotype groups. The implications extend to workplaces and educational settings, where implicit biases may subtly influence decision-making, resource allocation, and opportunities for autistic individuals, even when explicit discrimination is absent.
This study underscores the need to understand and mitigate unconscious biases to foster more inclusive and supportive environments for autistic people.
Source: medicalxpress.com
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Emotional Outbursts in Children as Predictors of Depression in Adolescence
Early emotional regulation difficulties in children are linked to increased risk of depression and anxiety symptoms during adolescence, emphasizing the need for early intervention strategies.
Positive Childhood Experiences Offer Protective Benefits Against Disordered Eating in College Students
A new study shows that positive childhood experiences can significantly protect college students from developing disordered eating behaviors, highlighting the importance of nurturing environments during childhood.
Can Recalling Past Memories Improve Problem-Solving Skills? Insights from Recent Research
Recent research explores whether recalling personal memories enhances problem-solving abilities, revealing nuanced effects depending on individual habits and task complexity.
Psychological Resilience: A Key Factor in Healthy Aging and Coping with Widowhood
Discover how psychological resilience influences mental health recovery in older adults facing widowhood and the importance of fostering resilience for healthy aging.



