Implicit Bias and Its Effect on Prosocial Effort in Autistic and Non-Autistic Individuals
Societal stigma and implicit biases influence how much effort autistic and non-autistic individuals put into charitable actions, highlighting the importance of addressing unconscious attitudes to foster inclusivity.
Recent research indicates that societal stigma and implicit biases towards autistic people can influence the level of effort individuals are willing to invest in prosocial or charitable behaviors. A study conducted by the University of Birmingham involved 30 autistic and 30 non-autistic adults who were asked to squeeze a hand grip to earn rewards either for themselves, for others sharing their neurotype, or for those with a different neurotype.
Findings revealed that all participants prioritized earning rewards for themselves over others, and efforts to help others were generally lower regardless of whether the recipient was autistic or non-autistic. Interestingly, while non-autistic individuals exerted similar effort for both autistic and non-autistic peers, autistic participants showed a tendency to invest more effort when helping fellow autistic individuals.
A significant aspect of the study was the assessment of implicit and explicit biases. Results showed that implicit biases against autistic people, measured through implicit association tests, were linked to a reduced willingness to exert effort for others. Explicit biases, on the other hand, did not predict effort levels.
For autistic individuals, stronger implicit biases correlated with lower motivation to help their autistic peers. In non-autistic participants, implicit biases did not affect effort directed at autistic individuals but were associated with increased effort for non-autistic peers.
Dr. Sophie Sowden-Carvalho emphasized the importance of these findings, suggesting that unconscious biases play a more substantial role in prosocial behavior than conscious attitudes. Addressing implicit biases and promoting acceptance can potentially improve support and cooperation between different neurotype groups. The implications extend to workplaces and educational settings, where implicit biases may subtly influence decision-making, resource allocation, and opportunities for autistic individuals, even when explicit discrimination is absent.
This study underscores the need to understand and mitigate unconscious biases to foster more inclusive and supportive environments for autistic people.
Source: medicalxpress.com
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Study Finds One-Third of Youth with Mental Health Emergencies Spend Over 12 Hours Waiting for Psychiatric Beds
A new study reveals that one-third of pediatric mental health emergency visits result in wait times over 12 hours for psychiatric beds, highlighting urgent care access issues.
Understanding Depression Through Brain Subtypes: New Research Highlights Complex Neurobiological Relationships
New research uncovers the complex neurobiological basis of depression, showing that different brain profiles can produce the same symptoms. This breakthrough underscores the need for personalized approaches in diagnosis and treatment, paving the way for more effective mental health interventions.
Brain Inflammation and Its Role in Repetitive Behaviors in Autism and OCD
New research reveals how brain inflammation may drive repetitive behaviors in autism and OCD, highlighting potential for existing anti-inflammatory drugs to serve as targeted treatments.
Impact of Stress on Brain Function and the Potential of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
Recent research shows how acute stress affects brain functions and highlights the potential of non-invasive brain stimulation, especially targeting the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, to mitigate stress-induced cognitive impairments.