Mia's Feed
Mental Health & Mindfulness

Implicit Bias and Its Effect on Prosocial Effort in Autistic and Non-Autistic Individuals

Implicit Bias and Its Effect on Prosocial Effort in Autistic and Non-Autistic Individuals

Share this article

Societal stigma and implicit biases influence how much effort autistic and non-autistic individuals put into charitable actions, highlighting the importance of addressing unconscious attitudes to foster inclusivity.

2 min read

Recent research indicates that societal stigma and implicit biases towards autistic people can influence the level of effort individuals are willing to invest in prosocial or charitable behaviors. A study conducted by the University of Birmingham involved 30 autistic and 30 non-autistic adults who were asked to squeeze a hand grip to earn rewards either for themselves, for others sharing their neurotype, or for those with a different neurotype.

Findings revealed that all participants prioritized earning rewards for themselves over others, and efforts to help others were generally lower regardless of whether the recipient was autistic or non-autistic. Interestingly, while non-autistic individuals exerted similar effort for both autistic and non-autistic peers, autistic participants showed a tendency to invest more effort when helping fellow autistic individuals.

A significant aspect of the study was the assessment of implicit and explicit biases. Results showed that implicit biases against autistic people, measured through implicit association tests, were linked to a reduced willingness to exert effort for others. Explicit biases, on the other hand, did not predict effort levels.

For autistic individuals, stronger implicit biases correlated with lower motivation to help their autistic peers. In non-autistic participants, implicit biases did not affect effort directed at autistic individuals but were associated with increased effort for non-autistic peers.

Dr. Sophie Sowden-Carvalho emphasized the importance of these findings, suggesting that unconscious biases play a more substantial role in prosocial behavior than conscious attitudes. Addressing implicit biases and promoting acceptance can potentially improve support and cooperation between different neurotype groups. The implications extend to workplaces and educational settings, where implicit biases may subtly influence decision-making, resource allocation, and opportunities for autistic individuals, even when explicit discrimination is absent.

This study underscores the need to understand and mitigate unconscious biases to foster more inclusive and supportive environments for autistic people.

Source: medicalxpress.com

Stay Updated with Mia's Feed

Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.

How often would you like updates?

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Related Articles

Reducing Alcohol Consumption May Lower Psychiatric Hospital Visits in Primary Care Patients

Reducing alcohol intake among primary care patients is linked to fewer hospital visits for mental health issues, emphasizing the importance of alcohol reduction strategies in improving mental health outcomes.

Understanding 'Cognitive Shuffling': A Science-Backed Technique for Better Sleep

Discover how cognitive shuffling—a technique involving unrelated words and images—may help improve sleep by distracting your mind and mimicking natural sleep transition patterns, supported by scientific research.

Molecular Strategy Extends Ketamine's Antidepressant Benefits in Mice for Up to Eight Weeks

Innovative research reveals that inhibiting DUSP6 to boost ERK activity can prolong ketamine's antidepressant effects in mice, offering hope for longer-lasting depression treatments.

New Book Examines Challenges in Developing Effective Treatments for Alzheimer's and Depression

A new book explores why treatments for Alzheimer's and depression have lagged despite scientific advances, emphasizing the need to understand the brain as a complex dynamic system to develop better therapies.