New Assessment Suggests Most Middle-Aged Adults Do Not Need Aspirin for Heart Prevention

New research reveals that most middle-aged adults may not need aspirin for heart disease prevention when using advanced cardiovascular risk models, emphasizing personalized assessment and reducing unnecessary medication use.
Recent research indicates that many middle-aged adults currently taking aspirin for cardiovascular prevention may not actually benefit from the medication when applying updated risk assessments. Studies from Rochester General Hospital, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and Aga Khan University have shown that newer cardiovascular risk prediction tools could significantly decrease the number of individuals deemed suitable candidates for aspirin therapy.
Traditional guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force recommend considering aspirin for adults aged 40 to 59 who are at least moderately at risk for cardiovascular events—specifically those with a 10% or higher 10-year risk, calculated using pooled cohort equations. However, these new findings suggest that when using the more refined PREVENT equations, the estimate of who should receive aspirin drops considerably.
Researchers analyzed data from 3,158 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey collected between 2015 and 2020. They focused on adults aged 40 to 59 without existing cardiovascular disease and excluded those with conditions increasing bleeding risk—like severe kidney problems, cancer, or use of blood-thinning medications.
Applying the traditional pooled cohort equations, approximately 8.3% of these individuals—around 4.9 million Americans—qualified for aspirin therapy. Yet, using the PREVENT equations, only approximately 1.2%, or about 700,000 adults, were found to be suitable candidates. Notably, the majority of individuals already using aspirin for prevention did not meet the new criteria under either assessment.
These findings raise important questions about current prescribing practices and highlight the need for updated guidelines tailored to the PREVENT risk assessment approach. The study emphasizes that many adults self-report aspirin use despite being outside the appropriate risk thresholds, presenting an opportunity to reconsider and potentially reduce unnecessary medication use.
Overall, the study advocates for more personalized risk evaluation and suggests that the blanket approach to aspirin for middle-aged adults may be outdated. Healthcare providers are encouraged to revisit patient risk profiles to make more informed decisions about aspirin therapy, reducing exposure to unnecessary bleeding risks without compromising cardiovascular prevention.
Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-10-aspirin-middle-aged-adults-unnecessary.html
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Innovative Gene-Edited Immune Cells Pave the Way for Universal 'Off-the-Shelf' Cancer Treatments
Scientists have developed a universal, off-the-shelf CAR-T cell therapy using gene editing to enhance immune evasion, promising faster and more accessible cancer treatment options.
Neurons Responsible for Social Behavior in Children and Teens Deactivate in Adulthood
Yale researchers have identified how specific neurons in the brain drive social behaviors in children and teens, and how these signals diminish in adulthood, revealing key aspects of neural development.
Using a Game to Combat Vaccine Misinformation: Innovative Approach Shows Promise
A new browser game, Bad Vaxx, demonstrates promising results in helping the public distinguish credible vaccine information from misinformation, aiming to strengthen immunity against health falsehoods.
Understanding How Our Minds Misjudge the True Environmental Impact of Our Choices
Discover how psychological illusions like the negative footprint illusion cause us to underestimate the true environmental impact of our choices and learn strategies to improve perception for better climate action.