UK Health Service Declines Funding for Costly Alzheimer's Treatments with Limited Benefits

The NHS has declined funding for two new Alzheimer’s medications, citing high costs and minimal benefits, amid ongoing debates about balancing innovation and affordability.
The UK’s National Health Service (NHS) has announced it will not cover two newly developed treatments aimed at slowing the progression of Alzheimer's disease, citing their high costs and modest clinical benefits. The drugs in question, Donanemab and Lecanemab, are regarded as promising advances in managing early-stage Alzheimer's, targeting the underlying cause of the disease by binding to amyloid proteins that accumulate in the brain. Both medications have been shown to delay the disease's progression from mild to moderate stages by approximately four to six months.
Donanemab is marketed as Kisunla by Eli Lilly, while Lecanemab is known as Leqembi, produced by Eisai. Despite regulatory approvals in the UK last year, the NHS’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) concluded that the benefits provided by the treatments are "too small" to warrant their significant costs, which are estimated to be between £60,000 and £80,000 annually per patient. NHS England had previously suggested that adopting these drugs could cost between £500 million and £1 billion annually.
Both pharmaceutical companies have indicated plans to appeal the decision. Eli Lilly UK’s President, Chris Stokes, criticized the stance, stating, "If the system can't deliver scientific firsts to NHS patients, it is broken." Although the drugs are not to be funded publicly, they remain approved for use and are available through private channels.
The approval of these treatments marked a milestone, as they represent some of the first medications to target the root causes of Alzheimer’s disease rather than just alleviating symptoms. The high price and limited observed benefits have sparked debate within the medical community about balancing innovation with affordability. Experts such as Siddharthan Chandran, Director of the UK Dementia Research Institute, acknowledged the disappointment but emphasized that these developments pave the way for more effective and accessible therapies in the future. Atticus Hainsworth, Professor at the University of London, defended NICE's cautious approach, asserting that the agency is fulfilling its role in ensuring treatments are both effective and cost-efficient.
The ongoing discussions highlight the challenges faced by healthcare systems worldwide in integrating groundbreaking but expensive therapies, especially for complex diseases like Alzheimer’s. As the debate continues, patients and clinicians await future advances that may offer more accessible options for combating this devastating condition.
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Simple, Non-Drug Therapies Show Greater Effectiveness for Knee Osteoarthritis Management
A new meta-analysis reveals that simple therapies like knee braces, water therapy, and exercise outperform high-tech options for knee osteoarthritis pain relief and mobility improvement.
Understanding the Implications of Biden's 'Aggressive' Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Urologic Surgeon
Understanding what makes Biden's prostate cancer 'aggressive' reveals the importance of tumor grade, stage, and genetics in guiding personalized treatment and improving outcomes.
Weight Loss Promotes Cellular Cleanup and Lipid Recycling, Enhancing Health
New research reveals how weight loss cleans aging cells and enhances lipid recycling in fat tissue, potentially improving metabolic health and aiding conditions like diabetes.



