Uncovering Risks: Surgeys by Troubled Doctors Leading to Severe Pain and Injuries

Recently, concerns have grown over the safety of cosmetic surgeries performed by doctors with problematic backgrounds. An investigation reveals that some practitioners, including those with histories of malpractice, disciplinary issues, or even licensing suspensions, are still offering procedures that can result in serious injuries and ongoing pain.

For example, California surgeon Andrew S. Hsu, who gained employment with a cosmetic surgery chain in Georgia, was linked to patients suffering disfigurement and injury. Despite being a board-certified general surgeon, Hsu’s practice history includes multiple malpractice lawsuits, disciplinary actions, and allegations of leaving foreign objects inside patients' bodies, such as scalpel blades and metal cannula tips. Further scrutiny uncovered that Hsu's medical license was revoked in California after repeated negligent acts, yet he continued practicing in other states.

The case of Hsu is part of a broader pattern where surgeons with problematic histories are hired by cosmetic clinics across the U.S.. Many of these clinics promote procedures like Brazilian butt lifts (BBLs) and liposuction as minimally invasive or quick fixes, often offering outside financing to attract patients. Shockingly, some of the surgeons involved have prior disciplinary records or a history of malpractice suits, yet are still practicing in different states.

Legal records and lawsuits illustrate some clinics’ attempts to hide or dismiss these issues, including pushing arbitration agreements to settle disputes privately. Patients, such as Charleetra Hornes, have suffered severe consequences, including burns, disfigurement, and lifelong injuries, after surgeries performed at these clinics, sometimes even while tested positive for COVID-19.

The lack of transparency and accountability in the cosmetic surgery industry complicates efforts for patients to make informed choices. There are no centralized public databases tracking complication rates or surgeon histories, leaving patients to decipher credentials alone. Court records reveal that some clinics' staff and surgeons possess extensive histories of malpractice, disciplinary actions, or misconduct, but continue to operate, posing ongoing risks.

Furthermore, the industry’s reliance on temporary staffing agencies, variable training standards, and misleading advertising contribute to unsafe practices. Some clinics promote 'fellowship' training that is unaccredited and not recognized by any official medical body, giving a false impression of expertise.

As the industry continues to expand, the dangers of surgeries performed by doctors with troubled pasts demand increased awareness and regulation. Patients must research thoroughly and question the credentials of surgeons to avoid life-altering injuries stemming from negligent or unqualified practitioners.