Bridging the Gap: Media Perceptions and Public Attitudes Towards Wild Meat Consumption in Central Africa During COVID-19

A new study reveals the disconnect between media messaging and public perceptions of wild meat during COVID-19 in Central Africa, highlighting the importance of culturally sensitive strategies for wildlife conservation and health.
A recent study conducted by researchers from the University of Oxford, the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), CIFOR-ICRAF, and partner organizations highlights a notable disconnect between media narratives and public perceptions regarding wild meat in Central Africa amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The research emphasizes the complex dynamics between media reporting, community beliefs, and behavioral responses, offering valuable insights for wildlife conservation and public health initiatives.
The study analyzed over 260 media articles from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, and the Republic of Congo, paired with phone surveys of more than 3,600 individuals in Cameroon and DRC. It found that media coverage predominantly focused on the potential risks of zoonotic spill-over from wild meat to humans, with about 61% of articles highlighting disease risks. In contrast, the public’s perceptions were more nuanced; many viewed domesticated red meat as more hazardous than wild meat when it came to disease transmission.
While health concerns led nearly half of Cameroonian respondents to reduce wild meat consumption, a third of DRC residents reported increasing their intake, citing scarcity and high costs of alternative protein sources. This divergence underscores the influence of local context and personal experience over media messages.
The study advocates for more culturally sensitive communication strategies, emphasizing community engagement and trusted local voices. Top-down bans and generic health warnings alone are insufficient. Instead, effective interventions should include offering safe, affordable wild meat substitutes, strengthening local institutions, law enforcement, and monitoring systems to support both biodiversity conservation and human health.
Lead author Yuhan Li states that understanding community motivations and social perceptions is crucial for designing impactful policies. The authors recommend evidence-based campaigns, collaborations with local influencers, and context-specific policies to foster sustainable behaviors and improve public health outcomes.
Source: MedicalXpress
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
The Impact of Friendship on Neural Synchrony and Consumer Behavior
Research shows that friendships influence brain activity and behavior, promoting neural similarity and impacting consumer decisions. The study highlights the powerful role of social bonds in shaping neural and behavioral patterns.
Resurgence of Measles in the United States Exceeds 1,000 Cases
The US faces a concerning resurgence of measles, with over 1,000 cases and three deaths, highlighting the urgent need for vaccination and combating misinformation. Learn more about this health crisis.
Liquid Biopsy-Driven Treatment Switch Enhances Outcomes in Breast Cancer Recurrence
A groundbreaking clinical trial shows that early detection of resistance mutations via liquid biopsy and switching to experimental drugs can significantly improve outcomes for advanced breast cancer patients.
Supporting LGBTQ+ Patients Enhances Preventive Healthcare Engagement
Supporting LGBTQ+ patients through culturally competent and affirming healthcare improves their engagement in preventive services, leading to better health outcomes and reduced long-term costs. Inclusive care environments are essential for public health success.