Long-Term Advantages of Preserving 'Hopeless' Teeth through Regenerative Dentistry

A groundbreaking 20-year study shows that regenerative periodontal procedures can save severely damaged teeth, offering long-term health benefits and cost savings compared to extraction and implants. Discover how advanced treatments are transforming dental care.
A comprehensive 20-year study presented at EuroPerio11, the premier conference on gum health and implant dentistry, highlights the significant benefits of saving teeth with advanced periodontal regeneration techniques, even when they are severely damaged. Conducted by the European Federation of Periodontology, the research compared patients who underwent regenerative procedures to preserve their natural teeth against those who had the teeth extracted and replaced with dental implants or bridges.
The findings challenge the traditional view that teeth with extensive bone loss are hopeless and should be removed. Instead, the study demonstrates that regenerative treatments, which use surgical methods and biocompatible materials to rebuild lost bone and tissue, can effectively preserve natural teeth, providing comparable or superior long-term outcomes.
Involving 50 patients with severe periodontitis (Stage III or IV), each had at least one tooth with attachment loss reaching the apex. Participants were divided into two groups: one received periodontal regeneration to save the tooth, and the other had the tooth extracted and replaced. After two decades, the results showed that only four teeth in the regeneration group were lost, compared to two failures in implant replacements. Patients maintaining their original teeth also experienced stable gum health and minimal complications.
Cost analysis revealed that preserving natural teeth with regenerative procedures was significantly more economical over the long term, considering ongoing maintenance and repair costs. Dr. Simone Cortellini from KU Leuven emphasized that regeneration offers a powerful option to extend the lifespan of damaged teeth, reducing the need for costly replacements.
However, the procedure's success depends on proper patient selection, good oral hygiene, and compliance. Regeneration is most suitable for healthy patients who do not smoke and are motivated to maintain oral health.
Leading experts, including EuroPerio11 scientific chair Lior Shapira, agree that regenerative techniques can be highly effective in the right candidates, presenting a sustainable alternative to tooth replacement. The ongoing development of biomaterials promises to expand the applicability of these methods.
The core message from this landmark study is to preserve natural teeth whenever possible. Regenerative dentistry not only provides similar or better outcomes but also offers considerable savings over time. As Dr. Cortellini states, "If it were your tooth, wouldn't you want to try to keep it first?"
[source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-05-term-benefits-hopeless-teeth.html]
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Early Use of Statins in Diabetes Patients Significantly Lowers Heart Attack and Stroke Risks
Early initiation of statin therapy in diabetic patients can significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes, highlighting the importance of timely treatment for cardiovascular health.
Innovative Approach Reduces Stroke Risk in Heart Failure Patients with LVADs
New research utilizing blood flow modeling offers promising strategies to reduce stroke risk in patients with LVADs, improving the safety and personalization of heart failure treatments.
Retinal Asymmetry as a Potential Early Marker for Cognitive Frailty
Retinal asymmetry between the eyes may serve as an early, noninvasive biomarker for cognitive frailty, aiding early detection and intervention in aging populations.
U.S. Meat Supply Tested by Olympic Anti-Doping Laboratory for Performance-Enhancing Substances
UCLA athletes' anti-doping testing methods are now used to analyze U.S. meat for performance-enhancing residues. The study confirms that beef, pork, and chicken typically contain safe levels of growth-promoting agents, supporting current regulatory practices.