Ethnic Variations in Routine Blood Tests and Cancer Risk Prediction in Primary Care
Research shows that routine blood tests for cancer risk are less effective in Asian and Black patients compared to white patients, highlighting the need for more personalized diagnostic strategies in primary care.
A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Exeter has revealed significant differences in the effectiveness of routine blood tests for predicting cancer risk across different ethnic groups. The study focused on common blood markers used in primary care, such as hemoglobin levels and mean corpuscular volume (MCV), which are typically employed to assess anemia and other health conditions.
The findings indicate that while these blood tests are valuable in predicting subsequent cancer risk among white patients, their predictive power is notably weaker among Asian and Black patients. Notably, low hemoglobin and low MCV, which are often indicators of iron deficiency anemia, did not reliably signal increased cancer risk in these populations. The strongest association with cancer diagnoses, particularly colorectal and esophageal-gastric cancers, was observed in white patients.
Published in the British Journal of General Practice, this research underscores the limitations of current diagnostic guidelines that do not account for ethnic variability. Dr. Tanimola Martins, a senior research fellow involved in the study, emphasized the need for more personalized approaches. He highlighted that these disparities likely stem from a combination of biological differences, lifestyle factors, socioeconomic status, and variations in healthcare access and testing frequency.
The implications are considerable, as early detection is crucial for improving cancer survival rates. Currently, guidelines primarily consider factors like age and sex, but fail to incorporate ethnicity, despite evident differences in cancer incidence and outcomes among diverse populations. For example, while white populations may have a higher overall risk of certain cancers, Black and Asian patients are often diagnosed at more advanced stages, particularly for gastrointestinal cancers.
This study calls for further research to understand these disparities and advocates for developing diagnostic strategies that are more inclusive and tailored to different ethnic groups. By doing so, healthcare providers can ensure timely and accurate cancer investigations for all patients, ultimately reducing health inequalities.
Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-08-primary-routine-blood-cancer-differ.html
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Risks of Nighttime Mouth Taping Promoted on Social Media for Sleep Breathing Issues
A recent review warns that the trendy practice of mouth taping during sleep, promoted on social media, may be ineffective and pose serious health risks, including asphyxiation, especially for those with nasal obstructions.
Innovative Robotic System Tested for Throat Cancer Surgery at King's College London
A new robotic system developed by CMR Surgical has been successfully tested for transoral throat cancer surgery at King's College London, promising safer, more efficient minimally invasive treatments.
Childhood Trauma and Its Link to Increased Endometriosis Risk
A large-scale study links difficult childhood experiences, especially violence exposure, to a significantly increased risk of developing endometriosis later in life. Early stressors may impact immune function and pain sensitivity, influencing women's reproductive health.
Rethinking Observation Times for Children with Allergic Reactions to Reduce Hospital Stay
Recent research indicates that many children with allergic reactions can be safely discharged from hospitals earlier, reducing unnecessary stays and improving care efficiency.