Study Finds No Advantage of Biomarker-Based Risk Scores in Personalizing Atrial Fibrillation Treatment

A recent study reveals that biomarker-based risk scores do not improve outcomes in personalized atrial fibrillation care compared to traditional guidelines, highlighting the need for further research in treatment customization.
Recent research presented at ESC Congress 2025 has concluded that using biomarker-based risk scores to tailor treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) does not lead to improved clinical outcomes compared to standard guideline-based care. The study, a large registry-based randomized trial conducted across 39 Swedish sites, investigated whether incorporating biomarker scores like ABC-AF-stroke and ABC-AF-bleeding into treatment decisions would reduce the incidence of stroke and death.
Patients eligible for the trial included adults diagnosed with AF, regardless of whether they were on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. Participants were randomized into two groups: a treatment arm guided by individual risk scores and recommendations, and a control group managed under usual clinical practice without biomarker data. Although the intervention successfully increased OAC use broadly, the primary outcome—composite of stroke or death—occurred at similar rates in both groups, around 3.2/100 patient-years.
The trial also found no significant differences in the rates of stroke, death, or major bleeding between the two arms over a median follow-up of 2.6 years. Despite the promising validation of these biomarker scores in previous studies, the results suggest that their implementation for personalized treatment did not provide additional benefit in this population. Notably, the trial was prematurely terminated due to safety concerns, and the event rates were lower than expected, leading to an underpowered study.
Lead researcher Professor Jonas Oldgren emphasized that further prospective testing is essential before integrating new risk stratification tools into routine AF management. Overall, this study underscores the importance of rigorous validation of precision medicine approaches and suggests that current standard care remains effective for stroke prevention in AF patients.
Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-09-benefit-biomarker-based-scores-personalize.html
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Minnesota Detects 13 New Cases of Measles in 2025, Total Reaches 18
Minnesota reports 13 new measles cases in 2025, raising the total to 18 amid declining vaccination rates and recent international travel-linked outbreaks. Vaccination remains crucial to prevent further spread.
Potential Risks of BPA Alternatives in Food Packaging on Ovarian Cell Functions
New research highlights potential risks of BPA substitute chemicals in food packaging disrupting ovarian cell functions, raising concerns over unregulated chemical use and consumer safety.
Strategies to Enhance HIV Care and Promote Racial Equity for Black Women
This article discusses key strategies and initiatives aimed at improving HIV care and promoting racial equity for Black women, highlighting systemic barriers and innovative solutions.
The Importance of Securing Canadian Health Data Amid Political Shifts
Canadian health data is vital for innovation, but political shifts pose risks to data sovereignty. Experts call for strengthened privacy laws and local infrastructure to protect national health information.