Evaluating the Potential and Limitations of Liquid Biopsies in Cancer Screening
Liquid biopsies offer a promising avenue for early cancer detection, but current evidence is insufficient to confirm their effectiveness and safety. Experts call for more rigorous research before widespread adoption.
Liquid biopsies, which analyze blood samples to detect circulating DNA, proteins, and other biomarkers associated with various cancers, are garnering significant interest for their potential to identify tumors that are otherwise difficult to detect early. Several laboratory-developed multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests—such as OneTest, Galleri, OncoSeek, and the newly launched Cancerguard—are available for purchase online with a doctor's note, although none have received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These tests are priced around $950 and aim to enhance early detection, especially for cancers lacking standard screening options, which account for up to 70% of cancer-related deaths.
However, the effectiveness of these tests in real-world settings remains uncertain. A comprehensive review of 20 studies involving over 109,000 individuals revealed significant variability in test accuracy depending on the type of cancer, the study design, and the population tested. Currently, there's a lack of controlled, clinical trials demonstrating that MCD tests improve cancer detection rates, reduce mortality, or enhance quality of life. The primary concern is the potential for false positives, which can lead to unnecessary invasive procedures, anxiety, and stress for healthy individuals.
Experts emphasize that, despite the technological advancements, the scientific community needs more rigorous research to establish the clinical benefits of liquid biopsies. The current evidence does not sufficiently weigh the benefits against the harms, and insurance coverage for such tests is often unavailable.
In conclusion, while liquid biopsies hold promise for revolutionizing cancer screening, their widespread use should be approached with caution. Additional controlled studies are essential to determine their true utility and to develop guidelines for their integration into clinical practice.
source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-09-liquid-biopsies-cancer-screening.html
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Scientific Study Clears Mosquitoes of Role in Spreading Lyme Disease
New research confirms that mosquitoes do not transmit Lyme disease, with ticks remaining the primary vectors. This discovery refines our understanding of disease transmission and guides better prevention strategies.
Innovative Far-Red Dopamine Sensor Enables Real-Time Brain Imaging
A team from Peking University has developed a pioneering far-red fluorescent dopamine sensor that enables real-time, multiplex imaging of neurochemicals in the living brain, advancing neuroscience research.
Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery Shorten Recovery Time for Pancreatic Cancer Patients
Minimally invasive surgical techniques are revolutionizing pancreatic cancer treatment, leading to shorter recovery times and better patient outcomes. Learn how advanced laparoscopic procedures are improving care at Mayo Clinic.
Critical Gaps in Genetic Cancer Risk Testing Revealed by Recent Study
A study uncovers significant gaps in genetic testing for Lynch syndrome among womb cancer patients, highlighting the need for improved screening processes to prevent future cancers and protect families.