Mia's Feed
Medical News & Research

Potential Bias in AI Tools May Undervalue Women's Health Needs in Social Care

Potential Bias in AI Tools May Undervalue Women's Health Needs in Social Care

Share this article

New research reveals that AI tools used in social care may underestimate women's health issues, risking gender bias and unequal treatment. Learn how these models impact care quality and fairness.

2 min read

Recent research from the London School of Economics indicates that large language models (LLMs), widely used across many local authorities in England to support social workers, may be inadvertently exhibiting gender bias. These AI systems, including popular models like Google's Gemma, are increasingly employed to assist in generating case summaries and easing administrative burdens. However, findings suggest that such tools may systematically underrepresent or diminish the portrayal of women's physical and mental health concerns compared to men's. The study analyzed real-world case notes and discovered that descriptions associated with men were more likely to include terms like "disabled," "unable," or "complex," which are crucial indicators of health needs. Conversely, similar issues faced by women were often less emphasized or described less seriously.

The research involved generating over 29,600 pairs of AI-generated summaries for individual case notes, with only gender swapped, to directly compare how the same case was treated for men and women. This revealed significant discrepancies in describing health issues, particularly mental health and physical conditions. Google's Gemma model exhibited more marked gender disparities than benchmark models such as Meta's Llama 3, which did not show language differences based on gender.

Dr. Sam Rickman, the lead researcher, emphasized the potential risks: reliance on biased AI summaries could lead social workers to assess identical cases differently based solely on gender. Since social care access is determined by perceived need, such biases might result in unequal treatment — disadvantaging women in particular.

While LLMs promise to streamline social work processes, their deployment must be transparent, thoroughly tested for bias, and subject to appropriate legal oversight to prevent systemic inequalities. This research marks the first to quantitatively evaluate gender bias in AI-generated social care records, highlighting the need for urgent attention to fairness and equity in AI applications within the public sector.

Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-08-ai-tools-downplaying-women-health.html

Stay Updated with Mia's Feed

Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.

How often would you like updates?

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Related Articles

Extended Diagnostic Delays for Children and Young People with Cancer Revealed by New Study

A new UK study uncovers significant delays in diagnosing cancer among children and young people, especially for certain tumor types and age groups, emphasizing the need for quicker detection efforts.

Breakthrough Phase III Trial Confirms Canagliflozin's Safety and Effectiveness for Treating Type 2 Diabetes in Youths

A groundbreaking Phase III trial confirms that canagliflozin is safe and effective for managing type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents, offering new hope for treatment options in this vulnerable group.

Impact of RSV Vaccines and Nirsevimab on Reducing Hospitalizations in Infants

Maternal RSV vaccines and nirsevimab significantly reduce hospitalization rates among infants during the 2024–2025 season, highlighting the importance of early prevention strategies.

Bystander T Cells Enhance the Effectiveness of Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Cancer Treatment

New research emphasizes the role of bystander T cells in enhancing the effectiveness of bispecific antibody therapy in lymphoma treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes through sequential CAR-T and BsAb approaches.