Potential Bias in AI Tools May Undervalue Women's Health Needs in Social Care

New research reveals that AI tools used in social care may underestimate women's health issues, risking gender bias and unequal treatment. Learn how these models impact care quality and fairness.
Recent research from the London School of Economics indicates that large language models (LLMs), widely used across many local authorities in England to support social workers, may be inadvertently exhibiting gender bias. These AI systems, including popular models like Google's Gemma, are increasingly employed to assist in generating case summaries and easing administrative burdens. However, findings suggest that such tools may systematically underrepresent or diminish the portrayal of women's physical and mental health concerns compared to men's. The study analyzed real-world case notes and discovered that descriptions associated with men were more likely to include terms like "disabled," "unable," or "complex," which are crucial indicators of health needs. Conversely, similar issues faced by women were often less emphasized or described less seriously.
The research involved generating over 29,600 pairs of AI-generated summaries for individual case notes, with only gender swapped, to directly compare how the same case was treated for men and women. This revealed significant discrepancies in describing health issues, particularly mental health and physical conditions. Google's Gemma model exhibited more marked gender disparities than benchmark models such as Meta's Llama 3, which did not show language differences based on gender.
Dr. Sam Rickman, the lead researcher, emphasized the potential risks: reliance on biased AI summaries could lead social workers to assess identical cases differently based solely on gender. Since social care access is determined by perceived need, such biases might result in unequal treatment — disadvantaging women in particular.
While LLMs promise to streamline social work processes, their deployment must be transparent, thoroughly tested for bias, and subject to appropriate legal oversight to prevent systemic inequalities. This research marks the first to quantitatively evaluate gender bias in AI-generated social care records, highlighting the need for urgent attention to fairness and equity in AI applications within the public sector.
Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-08-ai-tools-downplaying-women-health.html
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Privacy Risks of Menstrual Tracking Apps Highlight Need for Better Data Protection
Menstrual tracking apps collect sensitive personal data, presenting significant privacy and safety risks. Experts call for better regulation and public health alternatives to protect users and ensure data is used ethically.
The Risks and Benefits of Caffeine Pouches: A Modern Energy Boost
Caffeine pouches are a modern, discreet way to boost energy quickly, but they pose significant health risks, especially for young users and those with underlying conditions. Learn more about their effects and regulation issues.
Innovative Light and AI-Based Biosensor Promises Early Cancer Detection
A new AI-driven biosensor utilizing light signals enables highly sensitive and rapid early detection of cancer through blood sample analysis, promising advancements in diagnostics and personalized medicine.
Prozac Enhances Brain Plasticity by Modulating Energy Systems in Key Neurons
New research shows that Prozac promotes brain plasticity by altering energy management in key neurons, potentially improving depression treatment outcomes.



