NIH Reverses Decision to Cancel Research Grants After Court Ruling

The NIH has halted the cancellation of hundreds of research grants following a court ruling, marking a significant shift in federal research funding policies amid legal challenges.
NIH Reverses Decision to Cancel Research Grants Following Legal Ruling
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has paused the cancellation of numerous biomedical research grants after a federal judge deemed hundreds of previous cancellations illegal. This move comes in response to a legal challenge that highlighted the problematic nature of recent NIH actions.
Just days prior, U.S. District Judge William Young ordered the NIH to reinstate more than 900 grants that had been canceled. The lawsuit was filed in Boston and involved researchers and several state attorneys general challenging the NIH's decision to terminate these grants. According to STAT News, the legal case brought significant attention to the issue.
An internal email from Michelle Bulls, the director of the NIH's Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, instructed NIH officials that no further grant cancellations should proceed. She emphasized that all ongoing or queued terminations should be halted immediately, reflecting a court order that the agency must comply with.
This development is notable because, since President Donald Trump took office in January 2017, over 2,600 NIH grants—amounting to nearly $9 billion—were canceled, with many focused on diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), and LGBTQ+ health research. The recent court ruling now reinstates grants submitted by researchers involved in the lawsuit or residing in states where attorneys general joined the legal action.
The NIH and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have yet to release official comments on the reversal. The sudden halt in grant cancellations indicates a significant shift in NIH policy, likely influenced by the legal proceedings and judicial orders.
Meanwhile, the HHS publicly defended its previous funding decisions, asserting that they aimed to prioritize scientific rigor over ideological considerations. However, the judge's rejection of the administration's request to halt his ruling underscores the importance of legal oversight in federal research funding.
For now, NIH staff have been instructed to suspend all ongoing grant terminations until further notice. This pause is expected to impact ongoing research projects, especially those related to social justice and health equity. More information about federal funding and research grants can be found through sources like the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Source: Medical Xpress
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Potential Medicaid Reductions Could Unfairly Impact Older Workers and Their Well-being
Proposed Medicaid cuts threaten to disproportionately affect older workers by imposing strict work requirements that could lead to significant health coverage losses, according to recent research.
Enhancing Prenatal Care to Reduce Low Birth Weight Risks
A new study highlights the critical role of increased prenatal checkups in improving birth weights and reducing low birth weight cases in The Gambia, supporting better neonatal health outcomes.
Prevalence of Aspirin Use Among Older Adults Without Heart Disease Raises Concerns
A significant number of older adults are taking aspirin for cardiovascular prevention without medical advice, raising safety concerns amidst updated guidelines. Learn more about the risks and misconceptions.