Mia's Feed
Medical News & Research

Research Reveals Increased Fracture Risk After Discontinuing Hormone Replacement Therapy in Women

Research Reveals Increased Fracture Risk After Discontinuing Hormone Replacement Therapy in Women

Share this article

Discontinuing hormone replacement therapy in women leads to a rapid loss of bone fracture protection, with increased risk peaking around three years post-therapy. Ongoing bone health monitoring is essential for women after stopping MHT.

2 min read

A recent extensive study has uncovered that the protective effect of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), commonly known as hormone replacement therapy (HRT), against bone fractures diminishes rapidly within a year after women cease treatment. The research, published in Lancet Healthy Longevity, analyzed health data from six million women across the UK, offering insights into fracture risk patterns over a 25-year period.

During menopause, women experience a sharp decline in estrogen levels, leading to a range of physical and mental symptoms that often warrant the use of MHT. While estrogen plays a crucial role in maintaining bone density, previous studies have demonstrated that MHT reduces fracture risk during active use. However, it was unclear how long this protective benefit persists once the therapy is stopped.

The study found that most women lose their MHT-related fracture protection within approximately one year of discontinuation. Interestingly, the risk of fracture tends to rise above baseline levels, peaking around three years after stopping treatment. Afterward, the risk gradually declines, returning to levels comparable to women who have never used MHT after roughly ten years. This pattern was consistent across different types of hormonal treatments and varied based on the duration of prior MHT use.

The findings suggest that women who have previously used MHT continue to experience a period of higher fracture risk for several years post-therapy, which has important implications for clinicians managing bone health in menopausal women. Recognizing the timing of increased risk could prompt healthcare providers to monitor bone density and implement preventive measures during this vulnerable period.

Dr. Yana Vinogradova from the University of Nottingham emphasized that understanding these risk patterns can help guide decisions around the initiation and discontinuation of MHT, especially for women with existing risk factors such as smoking or inactivity. The study advocates for ongoing assessment of bone health and individualized treatment planning to mitigate fracture risks.

This research enhances our understanding of the long-term effects of hormone therapy and underscores the importance of continued bone health management in women transitioning out of MHT use.

Source: MedicalXpress

Stay Updated with Mia's Feed

Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.

How often would you like updates?

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Related Articles

Researchers Use Fitbit Distribution to Collect Representative Health Data

Distributing wearable devices like Fitbits to diverse populations enhances the accuracy and equity of health data collection, paving the way for more inclusive health research and AI tools. Learn how probability sampling and device provision outperform traditional convenience sampling.

Sharp Rise in Unintentional Pediatric Marijuana Ingestions in Tennessee

Unintentional marijuana ingestions among children under five in Tennessee have surged over 1,000% in recent years, raising concerns about safety and access to cannabis products amid changing laws and pandemic effects.

Study Links Physical Frailty to Increased Risk of Dementia

New research indicates that physical frailty significantly increases the risk of developing dementia, highlighting the importance of early detection and management of frailty to promote cognitive health.

New Biomarker Enables Personalized Treatment Selection in Multiple Sclerosis

A new genetic biomarker identified by researchers enables personalized treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis, improving outcomes by predicting response to glatiramer acetate versus interferon beta.