The Florida Group’s Efforts to Reshape Public Benefits Across States

A notable trend is emerging as a conservative organization based in Florida, known as the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA), advances policies aimed at limiting access to public assistance programs in various states. This year alone, at least 14 states have considered legislation to restrict certain benefits, with Idaho and Utah successfully passing laws that impose stricter eligibility requirements, including work requirements for food assistance. Notably, these efforts are part of a broader strategy to influence federal and state policy on social programs.

Recently, as Arizona prepared to send a bill to its governor's desk to restrict government aid for purchasing sugary drinks like soda, the nation's top health official, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., voiced support, emphasizing the intention to limit unhealthy food consumption funded by federal dollars. Although the Arizona governor vetoed the bill, the momentum for restricting the types of food low-income individuals can buy with benefits like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) persists, fueled by Kennedy’s statement that such policies align with his 'Make America Healthy Again' platform.

FGA, founded in 2011 by former Maine legislator Tarren Bragdon, has grown significantly — from a small organization with modest funding to a powerful policy influencer with a budget exceeding $15 million. Its primary goal is to advocate for policies that reduce government dependency by tightening eligibility for welfare programs such as SNAP and Medicaid. The organization argues that these reforms will save taxpayer dollars and promote self-sufficiency. However, critics contend that these proposals risk cutting off crucial aid to vulnerable populations, suggesting that making healthful foods and healthcare more affordable would be a better approach.

The group’s tactics include drafting legislation and providing policymakers with data, talking points, and support to promote stricter benefit rules. Over the years, FGA has helped draft laws that require more rigorous eligibility checks, impose work requirements, and restrict benefits in states like Mississippi, Idaho, Iowa, and Montana. For example, in Kansas, FGA-backed legislation significantly reduced SNAP caseloads, raising concerns about increased food insecurity.

FGA’s influence extends beyond individual states, with efforts to shape national policy under the current federal administration. Its strategy involves building a 'playbook' of policies that states can adopt, exerting pressure on federal authorities to approve state-level waivers and restrictions. The organization also maintains significant activities inside the political sphere, including research, media campaigns, and lobbying efforts.

Supporters argue that these reforms promote fiscal responsibility and accountability, while opponents warn that such measures often lead to unnecessary hardship for low-income families. As policymakers and advocacy groups continue to debate, the role of organizations like FGA remains central to the ongoing reshaping of the social safety net in the United States.