Mia's Feed
Medical News & Research

Impact of Dobbs v Jackson Decision on Abortion Provider Relocation in Banning States

Impact of Dobbs v Jackson Decision on Abortion Provider Relocation in Banning States

Share this article

A recent study reveals that 42% of abortion providers in states with bans have relocated post-Dobbs, impacting healthcare access and maternal outcomes. Learn more about this significant shift in reproductive healthcare.

2 min read

Following the landmark Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling in 2022, significant shifts among abortion providers have been observed. A recent research letter published in June 2025 in JAMA Network Open reveals that approximately 42% of surveyed clinicians who previously offered abortions in states with restrictive laws have relocated their primary practice to other states. The majority of these relocations were toward states where abortion remains legal, highlighting the widespread impact of the decision on healthcare access.

The study, led by Dr. Dana Howard from The Ohio State University College of Medicine, analyzed responses from 305 clinicians who provided abortion or related healthcare services before the Dobbs decision. The findings indicate that 16% of providers changed their main practice location after the ruling. Providers working in states with bans were significantly more likely to relocate, with 42% making a move compared to 9% in no-ban states. Most of those leaving ban states moved to no-ban states (89%), while most relocating from no-ban states moved within their region (90%). Additionally, about 6% of respondents ceased providing abortion care altogether.

These patterns suggest that changes in provider locations are contributing to healthcare deserts, potentially impacting maternal health outcomes and exacerbating disparities. Since most providers also offer other healthcare services, their relocation can diminish overall access to reproductive health services in affected regions.

The research underscores the far-reaching consequences of the Dobbs ruling on healthcare workforce distribution and patient access to abortion services. It raises concerns about increased barriers to care and highlights the need for policy responses to address these disparities.

Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-06-dobbs-decision-surveyed-abortion-states.html

Stay Updated with Mia's Feed

Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.

How often would you like updates?

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Related Articles

Independent Studies Disprove Rumors of New Neurological Disease in New Brunswick

Recent research discredits claims of a new neurological disease in New Brunswick, revealing existing neurodegenerative conditions as the true diagnoses, highlighting the importance of accurate diagnostics.

Potential of Anti-Malarial Drugs in Promoting Weight Loss: New Research Findings

Research reveals that anti-malarial drugs like halofuginone may help promote weight loss by regulating appetite and energy metabolism through GDF15 and FGF21 pathways. This innovative approach, rooted in traditional Chinese medicine, offers promising new options for obesity treatment.

Research Reveals Flaws in Running Shoe Heels Could Elevate Injury Risk

A groundbreaking study reveals that over a third of running shoes may increase injury risk due to poor heel cushioning design. Improved testing methods could enhance safety for runners.

Link Between Low-Level Arsenic Exposure in Drinking Water and Adverse Birth Outcomes

New research shows that even low levels of arsenic in public drinking water may increase risks of preterm birth and low birth weight, highlighting the need for stricter water safety standards.