Impact of Dobbs v Jackson Decision on Abortion Provider Relocation in Banning States

A recent study reveals that 42% of abortion providers in states with bans have relocated post-Dobbs, impacting healthcare access and maternal outcomes. Learn more about this significant shift in reproductive healthcare.
Following the landmark Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling in 2022, significant shifts among abortion providers have been observed. A recent research letter published in June 2025 in JAMA Network Open reveals that approximately 42% of surveyed clinicians who previously offered abortions in states with restrictive laws have relocated their primary practice to other states. The majority of these relocations were toward states where abortion remains legal, highlighting the widespread impact of the decision on healthcare access.
The study, led by Dr. Dana Howard from The Ohio State University College of Medicine, analyzed responses from 305 clinicians who provided abortion or related healthcare services before the Dobbs decision. The findings indicate that 16% of providers changed their main practice location after the ruling. Providers working in states with bans were significantly more likely to relocate, with 42% making a move compared to 9% in no-ban states. Most of those leaving ban states moved to no-ban states (89%), while most relocating from no-ban states moved within their region (90%). Additionally, about 6% of respondents ceased providing abortion care altogether.
These patterns suggest that changes in provider locations are contributing to healthcare deserts, potentially impacting maternal health outcomes and exacerbating disparities. Since most providers also offer other healthcare services, their relocation can diminish overall access to reproductive health services in affected regions.
The research underscores the far-reaching consequences of the Dobbs ruling on healthcare workforce distribution and patient access to abortion services. It raises concerns about increased barriers to care and highlights the need for policy responses to address these disparities.
Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-06-dobbs-decision-surveyed-abortion-states.html
Stay Updated with Mia's Feed
Get the latest health & wellness insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Related Articles
Reevaluating Phototherapy in Neonatal Jaundice: The Impact of Skin Color on Treatment Effectiveness
Emerging research suggests that skin pigmentation significantly influences the effectiveness of phototherapy in treating neonatal jaundice, highlighting the need for personalized approaches for diverse skin tones.
CRISPR Gene Editing in Blood Stem Cells May Induce Premature Aging: New Insights and Solutions
New research reveals that CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in blood stem cells can induce premature aging responses, but strategies like anti-inflammatory treatments can improve safety and efficacy for blood disorder therapies.
Estrogen-Related Receptors as Promising Targets for Metabolic and Muscular Disease Treatment
New research from the Salk Institute identifies estrogen-related receptors as promising targets for improving mitochondrial function and treating metabolic and muscular disorders.
Advances and Challenges in Alzheimer's Disease Research: A Vital Turning Point
Recent advancements in Alzheimer's disease research offer hope for early detection and new treatments, but funding and translational challenges remain critical hurdles. Experts emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to slow or prevent disease progression.